Discuss the ways horror films are produced & distributed
The film industry is
possibly the most successful industry within the media world. When making a
film whether or not it is made in the United Kingdom or Hollywood, the same
process is under taken. The process consists of four prime areas. These areas
are; production, distribution, marketing and exhibition. Key to any hit film is perhaps due to the
fact that it is distributed and marketed in a sufficient way. There are six
main conglomerates within Hollywood including Warner Brothers and Universal. The
reason that these studios are so big is solely on the fact that they use
vertical integration. This provides the studios with a chance to uses methods
like synergy to distribute and market their film correctly and to the right
audience.
The evolution of digital technology has determined the
movement of the expectations of the audience. Expectations that a film will
provide a more spectacular viewing and portrayal of a story by using high
quality effects are all prejudices made before a viewing of the film. Independent
producers may find it difficult to find enough funding to meet these
expectations meaning that the ultra-high budget tentpoles and mainstream films
appear to be more appealing to consumers. However, the conventions of a horror
film allow independent movie producers to create films that can be visually
spectacular. For example Paranormal Activity (2007) had an extremely low budget
of $15,000, yet due to its unique style the filming expense of it was extremely
low. For example, horror is normally set in everyday locations to maintain a
sense or normality in the otherwise twisted and unrealistic narratives, this is
often a characteristic of an independent film. The experimental nature of
independent films such as paranormal activity can benefit producers because
they can substitute expensive techniques with cheaper and often incredibly
similar practices. This has been proven in Paranormal Activity. Although this
films budget was so small that it was not able to advertise itself a great
amount it still achieved an astounding $193,000,000 in box office, through this
huge success the film was then able to establish a sequel meaning profit form
then onwards was inevitable. In addition to this they would also be able to
have a larger budget for the other films due to the large profit made
previously.
When it comes to distribution, it is difficult for
independent films to gain prominence over the ever-present hegemonic status of
the 6 major Hollywood studios. An independent studio such as 'blumhouse productions'
that created paranormal activity often favour style over genre and challenge
conventional film techniques. As the budget for paranormal activity was so low
the distribution for this film was even more of a challenge. However the distributions
could not consist of billboards or adverts publishing the film throughout the
world but promoting their film for low prices at film festivals such as the BFI
(London) film festival, even thought independent films tend to spend 50% of their production funds on marketing for a film as this is such a large aspect of its success, know as the 'budget commensurate with target audience'. Independent films generally rely on the ‘water cooler’
culture and cinephiles but often find it difficult to budget enough to globally
advertise their movies to the extent that the 6 major Hollywood studios
distribution of the film more successful. However in the 21st centaury the development of Web 2.0 has really brought about the rise in independent films meaning that they can easily and cheaply advertise their films globally using this resources. This has subsequently affected both independent and industrial film in a positive and negative way.
·
Mainstream industrial horror films are
distributed much like any other industrial film: with an advertising campaign
involving trailers, posters, websites, billboard adverts and TV adverts etc.
For example "The Conjuring" (Wan, 2012) first released posters
introducing the stars' characters, followed by a teaser trailer which was
released at Comic Con.
·
The film based its advertising campaign heavily
on the idea of the film being "based on a true story" as it follows
the tale of real life paranormal activity specialists Ed and Lorraine Warren
who inspired "The Amityville Horror" (Douglas, 2005).
·
In the final weeks leading up to the film’s
release the real-life family made appearances on talk spots, which was finally
followed by a feature entitled "The Devils Review" which showed the
real-life Lorraine Warren explaining some events in the film.
·
The film was a huge success at the box office,
with a budget of $20 Million making $316,700,141 at the box office.
As with all
industrial films the size of the budget available to industrial filmmakers is
significantly larger than that of independent filmmakers. This often means
films are more visually impressive, contain extensive visual effects containing
effects such as CGI and pro filmic effects, or even have Hollywood A-list
actors as they not only potentially offer better performances, they hopefully
provide a reassurance of the films quality to the audience.
·
An example of an industrial Hollywood horror film
is "The Cabin in The Woods" (Goddard, 2012) which had a budget of $30
Million, generating a disappointing $66 Million technically making the film a
failure.
·
Given the success of certain Horror films, often
sequels, occasionally prequels, and a host of spin-offs are made. An example of
this is the previously mentioned "Paranormal Activity" film which
since became a franchise, with six films in. The films become less well
celebrated as the franchise continues however despite the lack of critical
acclaim the films manage to remain huge successes.
To conclude, the comparison between ‘Paranormal activity’
and ‘The Conjuring’ is in some respects very different but in other very
similar. The process in which, both the big five studio films and the independent
studio films, is they are identical but with different means of going about
each area. For example when distributing a film the Hollywood film would start
releasing information and trailer a year before the film is released, on the
other hand when an independent film is distributed they have limited about of
money and recourses to send it round the world to be advertised. Another vital
element is that the films that both film studios produce is very different as
the Hollywood films prime goal is to make a profit, where as a small
independent film makes a film for the passion and enjoyment of filmmaking. This
shows in the film themselves i.e. ‘The Conjuring’ already has a guaranteed
audience and is inevitably going to make a lot of money where as ‘Paranormal
activity’ has a hard demographic as it is a new film with a unique story that
only certain people may find appealing. In answer to the question, the ways in
which media products are produced and distributed to audiences is essentially
very different between two types of filmmaking but all film undergo the same
process. I believe that both types of film are uniquely very good and are part
of a rising media.
Excellent work Jack, you show very good understanding of the process and the contrast between industrial and independent is well demonstrated with the case studies you discuss. To improve: juxtapose more fully the production practices of industrial and independent through case study material and also outline more about the industrial institution. A useful phrase to use would be, 'budget commensurate with target audience' and the fact that studios' budget for marketing is 50% of their production costs. Independents rely on web 2.0, ie the internet and viral marketing plays a significant part. Please email me with the updates and I will look again. Well done, very pleasing, presentation needs amending but I will talk to you about that in class.
ReplyDeleteWell done Jack, the intro and conclusion could make reference to more of the issues surrounding the two business models but you show clear understanding of the debate and include some relevant case study material. B
ReplyDelete